From: Mitchell, Paul <p.mitchell@ucl.ac.uk>
To: Jason W Neyers <jneyers@uwo.ca>
obligations@uwo.ca
Date: 30/06/2017 08:47:28 UTC
Subject: Re: Deceit Damages Case

Yes - Barton v County Natwest Ltd, Court of Appeal (Civil Division), where the representation induced the claimant to persevere in a decision already taken about entering into a security transaction: [2002] 4 All E.R. 494 (Note); [1999] Lloyd's Rep. Bank. 408; [1999] E.G. 103 (C.S.); (1999) 96(33) L.S.G. 31; Times, July 29, 1999.


Paul



From: Jason W Neyers
Sent: 29 June 2017 14:57
To: obligations@uwo.ca
Subject: ODG: Deceit Damages Case 
 

Dear Colleagues:

 

Has anyone ever come across a deceit case where the claimant was awarded damages in a situation where, instead of giving away something (money, shares, etc) or purchasing something, they retained something (shares or an investment) and this retention caused them damage/loss?

 

Sincerely,

 

 

esig-law

Jason Neyers
Professor of Law
Faculty of Law
Western University
Law Building Rm 26
e. jneyers@uwo.ca
t. 519.661.2111 (x88435)